while trying:
ollama pull hf-co /empero-ai/Qwen3.8-35B-A3B-Distill-GGUF:Q8_0
got error:
blocked redirect to a different host
edit: resolved after some time
while trying:
ollama pull hf-co /empero-ai/Qwen3.8-35B-A3B-Distill-GGUF:Q8_0
got error:
blocked redirect to a different host
edit: resolved after some time
Glad to hear it eventually resolved — that redirect error usually comes from a temporary CDN switch on the HF side, and Ollama blocks cross‑host redirects for safety.
If you have a moment, could you leave a quick feedback about whether the pull speed and model loading behaved normally after the issue cleared? It helps track whether the redirect glitch had any side effects on the client.
I am constantly seeing the same error, it does not resolve after waiting some time. It happens only for hugging face models e.g. ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-IQ4_XS
However, it works fine with models hosted on Ollama.com e.g. https://ollama.com/batiai/gemma4-e2b
I have the same issue. After how much time is the issue supposed to “resolve itself”?
Is there no workaround to be still able to run hf models in ollama?
Same here. I can no longer download models from Hugging Face, only those hosted on Ollama.com. I’ve also tried several times, but it doesn’t resolve on its own after a while. Any solutions?
Edit: I was able to complete the installation using the command ollama pull --insecure ``hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-IQ3_S
yep, now again getting this error with ollama pull hf.co/TokenRhythm/NeoHorse-1-4B-GGUF:BF16
but thanks to @mattks92 --insecure option it now pulls
That redirect error usually comes from a temporary CDN host switch on HuggingFace.
Ollama blocks the cross‑host redirect for security reasons, so the pull fails until the endpoint stabilizes.
Using --insecure bypasses the certificate/host check and lets the pull continue normally.
Nothing wrong with the model or the repo — just a transient network condition.
I know this has been marked as solution, and the --insecure is working for me. but I think there should be a more robust way of saying: If I ask you hf.co is ok that you get us.aws.cdn.hf.co
for me the --insecure opens an insecure can of worms ![]()